The Chestertown Recreation Committee pitched a revised Ajax basketball court proposal to the Town Council during Tuesday night’s rescheduled meeting. CRC member Frank Rhodes offered a Powerpoint narrative of the CRC’s enhancements.

Tuesday’s meeting brought in dozens of town residents expressing the pros and cons of upgrading the half-court by adding a second hoop and 20’ of additional asphalt.

Many of the community discussions have been guided by several misunderstandings: one, that the CRC would be transforming the site into a full-sized court; and that the court overhaul would supplant the children’s playground. Rhodes sought to clarify these issues. 

Instead, a new children’s play space, proposed and approved by the Town Council, would be moved to Wilmer Park once funding is completed; and the court dimensions are smaller than full-size adult court.

Acting Mayor Rev. Ellsworth Tolliver opened the meeting to public comment giving equal time for those in favor and those against the proposal to improve Ajax. 

The Council will make a decision during the first town council meeting in May.

Due to the length of the meeting and internet connectivity issues, the video clip is a snapshot of the many who called in or texted their support or disfavor of a renovated Ajax. Those in favor believe that an improved youth activity area is good for downtown and is invitational and a welcoming atmosphere to cultivate racial equity and enhance recreational opportunities for visitors.

Non-supporter issues ranged from keeping the court as-is but renovated; noise issues impacting local businesses; An overabundance of basketball courts; and that the plan represented a misuse of property in a commercial area.

To weigh the full spectrum of participants’ considerations, the Spy recommends viewing the full discussion when it appears on the town government YouTube channel here.  

Referencing off the graphic below, Rhodes read a prepared statement attached here:

“The presentation is for a Youth size Basketball court, which is 74’X 42’. Our proposed court will reside inside the easement, or 74’ X 35’, making it close to the original court size but smaller than a youth size. The original Ajax court was on a pad approximately 100’ X 36’

We believe this is an historic site because erected in 1978 this dual basket court provided an outlet for hundreds of parents who today have children of their own. There are other pocket courts today in Chestertown, but besides the historic significance, being close to downtown, next to the Gilchrest walking trail and restored environment, this is a safe space for youth to play hoops. This proposed court expansion is approximately 50 feet from the original and will be located on town owned property. The railroad station is also not in its original location, being moved closer to the basketball park to make way for the Cross street curve upon restoration of that area. The parking lot leading up to Ajax Pocket Park that serves the town is currently owned by the Barry family, who have sent a letter of approval, with a quote “ we view this project as an opportunity for more kids to participate in this healthy sport in a safe manner. This will make our wonderful town an even better place for all” Full letter was submitted to the M&C. The town does have a 15’ easement leading to the maintenance yard on this property. Also submitted to the M&C is a note from Mr. Robbie Gill, CEO YMCA Chesapeake region that says “ Hey Frank, thanks for the email. Sure thing sharing I’ve seen the site and it is a good outlet”. A letter sent to the town council by Robert Ortiz “ I am writing you wearing two hats at least. One as a citizen who lives in Chestertown and also as one of the few minority owned business owners who has a store in Downtown Chestertown across the street from the Ajax court location. I believe that the rail/trail section of Chestertown is actually the most diverse and integrated part of Chestertown. I regularly see children, adults, retired persons, working people, and persons of African American, Latin American and European American ancestry using this area. Anything our town council can do to enhance this area should be encouraged. The proposed improvements recommended by the Recreation Committee should be implemented”. There have been many more letters of support sent to the M&C.

We plan to fundraise locally through businesses and citizens. Minary’s Dream Alliance or MDA, a 501-3C will be the sponsoring organization collecting donations, approval letter sent to the M&C. We also plan to work directly through the town for implementation after approval. 

Costs:

1) New macadam, $4800

2) Install new heavy-duty gooseneck poles , $3800

3) New extra strength poles, backboards and baskets $4800

4) New benches $2000

5) Unexpected costs $2000

6) Paint town seal at center court, local artist

7) Painting the court lines has been donated

Total approximate costs, $17,400

We plan to seek private donations. Basketball youth will help in fundraising with receipts for all funders. We already have people who want to help fund this project today. Back in 1978, the phone company and Delmarva power agreed to help with install of the posts. Maybe that might be a funding possibility we could pursue. One person donated funds for a gooseneck pole back in 1978. We would like this project to be a community effort. With the possibility of the Wilmer grant, the new marina and this court the town will start a path to attract more youth and younger families. Inclusivity for all!

The Ajax committee will maintain the court. Will the town maintain the lawn, and provide suggestions for moving the existing toddler playground to the side of the trail as proposed in our plan. We will raise the necessary funds for this project before implementation. Also, we would like to start the project with or without grant funding for Wilmer Park. The existing swing set and toddler playground will remain. We have submitted 309 signed names of approval to the M&C.”

 

 

One of the most sensitive issues of America’s past is the more than 4,000 terror lynchings that ended Black lives between 1887 and 1950.

In 1892 one lynching took place a few yards from the Kent County Courthouse on Cross Street: James Taylor. Like all victims of lynching, Taylor did not receive his day in court.

During Tuesday night town council meeting, Larry Wilson and Phil Dutton, co-chairs of the James Taylor Justice Coalition of Sumner Hall presented a slide show of the group’s plans to memorialize the dark chapter in Kent County’s history.

“We believe that acknowledging the unvarnished truth about the legacy of slavery is fundamental to unifying our community in peace and harmony, enabling us to work together to address the ongoing challenge of present-day racism,” Wilson recited from the Coalition’s mission statement.

Dutton explained that The James Taylor Coalition is partnered with the Community Remembrance Project of the Equal Justice Initiative in Montgomery, Alabama.

EJI, a prominent prison reform and racial justice organization, works in tandem with communities to “memorialize documented victims of racial violence and foster meaningful dialogue about race and justice.”

To that end, EJI created The Community Soil Collection Project, wherein soil from the sites of documented lynchings is sent to Montgomery and displayed in marked jars in their museum. Soil from the Chestertown site will find a place there.

Dutton sees the James Taylor Justice Coalition as a pathway for the community to process its racist past and, through education, help the community evolve into a better understanding of racial injustice and the steps needed to rise above it.

For more information about the James Taylor Justice Coalition, go here. For the Equal Justice Initiative, go here.

This video is approximately seven minutes in length. For more information about

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An ordinance bill to establish a Human Rights Commission was on its way to passage during Monday night’s Town Council meeting—until it wasn’t.

The ordinance will now go to a committee of council members to resolve textual inconsistencies between the Resolution Against Racism and the Ordinance Establishing a Human Rights Commission.

The Resolution Against Racism was revised before its passage on September 7 to extract the sentence “The Human Rights Commission will be empowered to investigate and resolve allegations of discrimination in employment, housing, by town agencies and by businesses.” It was removed to clarify that the Commission was not designed to function as an investigative or punitive mechanism.

However, Ward 2 Councilman Tom Herz pointed out that the same text appears in the language of the current ordinance and needed to be removed to be in concert with the final resolution’s language.

Merz also wants the Council to consider widening protections against discrimination of all kinds. While fighting systemic racism was fundamental to writing anti-discrimination policy, Herz said that he wanted the ordinance to be more inclusive and consider adding “age, race, religion, color, sex, ancestry, country of origin, marital status, disability, and sexual orientation” to the list of protected right.

Additionally, Herz offered a motion to amend Ordinance 02020 in committee and resubmit it to the Council for passage. Mayor Cerino seconded the motion to move the ordinance into committee to address changes, additions and edits to the text.

That meeting, open to the public, will be held on Monday November 9 from 7pm-9pm.

Commenting to the Spy today, Herz said that the Council needed to be sensitive to getting the ordinance right.

This video is approximately nine minutes in length.