MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
May 11, 2025

Chestertown Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Chestertown

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy
Point of View Op-Ed

Efforts to Ban Abortion Disregard Environmental Challenges

March 19, 2020 by Letter to Editor

Share

Despite a majority of Americans’ support for women’s right to choose — a decision set by the Supreme Court nearly 50 years ago — attempts to diminish abortion rights for women remain relentless. A Pew Research report from 2019 found that upwards of 60% of Americans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases.  

However, anti-abortion activists around the country have passed a variety of state laws making it increasingly difficult for women to end their pregnancies.  One strategy has been to pursue state-wide, medically unnecessary, gestational bans. In other words, women would not be allowed to have abortions, a constitutional right, once their pregnancies have progressed to a certain length of time after their last menstrual periods.  Bans have been proposed for as short a period as six weeks, often before women may even know they are pregnant. 

Environmental groups, such as the Sierra Club, have been involved in protecting women against these bans.  Environmental groups focus their efforts on creating a world in which all humans can live in safe, healthy environments.  Comprehensive reproductive health care is essential to that goal. Reproductive freedom is thus considered a basic human right. 

            Lack of control over the timing of childbearing interferes with an individual’s ability to pursue educational, economic, and social opportunities.  Women without means are the victims in these scenarios and are less likely to have adequate resources to care for children once they are born; low-income people are also subject to living in areas with more environmental hazards (close to incinerators, coal plants, etc.).  

In contrast, wealthy women have always been able to gain access to pregnancy termination services and will continue to do so regardless of increasing restrictions on abortion. In addition, those with means are able to raise their families in healthy, safe communities.There is growing recognition that environmental issues are inextricably linked to issues like gender and economic inequality. It is important that we reject intrusive measures that presume to understand the challenges others face. Instead, we must provide access to safe, legal and affordable family planning for all who seek it.

Reproductive justice, economic justice, and environmental justice are three inexplicably tied movements. The right to choose if, when, and how we become pregnant cannot be separated from the right to raise those families in healthy, safe environments and afford all the basic life necessities.

Susan Olsen, M.A., M.Ed.
Our Maryland
Mike Pretl Community Impact Fellow

Sydney Jacobs
Conservation Co-Chair
Maryland Sierra Club

Isabel Blalock, MPH
Field Director, Abortion Access Campaign
NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

The Great Slow Down List: Liz and Howard Freedlander CES Closes Offices to Public; Cancels, Postpones Spring Events

Letters to Editor

  1. Deirdre LaMotte says

    March 19, 2020 at 9:16 PM

    I agree. Reproductive freedom is a human right. Women’s ability to choose if or when to reproduce is a basic right and should be a
    personal choice only.

    Perhaps the theocratic witch doctors and lawmakers need to realize that pregnancy, not sex, is the number one killer of
    fetuses.

Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article

We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff.
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Cambridge Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Health
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2025 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in