MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
May 16, 2025

Chestertown Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Chestertown

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy
3 Top Story

Queen Anne’s YMCA Project Dead… Again

December 10, 2014 by James Dissette

Share

Newly elected Queen Anne’s county commissioners quashed the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the county and YMCA of the Chesapeake during their first meeting as a new commission. The meeting was held Monday, December 9.

A relationship between YMCA and Queen Anne’s County has been sought for years, the MOU being the last version of an ongoing attempt to have a Y in Queen Anne’s County.

The commissioners stated that they were not against the YMCA per se, and that nullifying the MOU was “not an attack on the YMCA,” but that underwriting the enterprise did not best serve their tax-paying constituents. Instead, they proposed a sub-committee to approach the YMCA of the Chesapeake to seek a new arrangement.

The county has an eight million dollar surplus after several years of deficit. As late as May, 2014, the county had restored $4M in funding for the project in fiscal year 2015. A month earlier, in April, 2015, the funding had been removed from the budget by the commission.

Several residents stated the commonly held position that a YMCA is a crucial component to community health and offered positive impacts for economic development for the region.

A December 6, 2013 QA County website description of the MOU included this agreement description:

“According to the MOU, the county commits to expend up to $8 million for design and construction of the facility and the YMCA agrees to reimburse the county $4 million within seven years. The county, with input from the YMCA, will oversee design and construction of the facility, but once completed the YMCA will be solely responsible for maintenance and repairs of the facility. The YMCA will staff, manage and operate the facility. Although the county will own the building, the MOU establishes the agreement that the county will lease the facility to the YMCA for a period of 99 years at a cost of $1 per year.”

The following videos show QAC residents making their case for a continued effort to make the MOU work, along with the commissioner’s debate and subsequent voiding of the MOU while pledging to find an alternative way of bringing a YMCA to the county.

Appearing in this video are commissioners Steve Wilson, Paul Comfort, James Moran, Mark Anderson, and Robert Buckey.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story

Good Licking: Chicago Blues Sensation Comes to the Garfield Health: New Outpatient Surgery Center in Queenstown

Letters to Editor

  1. Mary Margaret Revell Goodwin says

    December 10, 2014 at 3:46 PM

    Unfortunately the headline appears to declare the death of the YMCA project, and it is not dead. ONLY the MOU is dead. It deserves to be. It was not in the best interests of the County’s taxpayers, nor had the Y shown sufficient proof they could raise the funds. The MOU needed to reflect a different set of conditions to assure that it would be built and the county would not ultimately be stuck with the bills. I wish the title had been framed a little better so that the public understands there is now a new committee to review and revive the possibilities.

  2. Monica Sella says

    December 11, 2014 at 10:24 AM

    Some of my fondest childhood memories are from Y activities. Too bad Kent County could not attract the Y and take advantage of everything they have to offer!

Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article

We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff.

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Cambridge Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Health
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2025 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in