MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
September 22, 2023

Chestertown Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Chestertown

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy
Top Story

Poll Question #4: Which Party is Better on National Debt Reduction

September 9, 2012 by The Spy

Share

With the conventions now over, voters have more information to determine which political party has the best solutions for overall deficit reduction.  Or was the reccomendations of the Simpson-Bowles Debt Reduction Commission the best way forward?

Figures come from the The Tax Foundation is a nonpartisan tax research group based in Washington, D.C..

                                                                       Obama                                    Romney                               Simpson-Bowles

Top Marginal Rate on Personal Income

39.60%

28%

23%-28%

Top Marginal Rate on Long Term Capital Gains

30%*

15%

23%-28%

Top Marginal Rate on Dividends

43.4%**

15%

23%-28%

Top Marginal Rate on Corporate Income

28%

25%

26%-28%

Top Marginal Rate on Corporate Income from Foreign Sources

28%

0%

0%

Tax Expenditures (Some 250 credits, deductions, and other preferences amounting to more than $1 trillion a year)

Adds more than are taken away and complicates many existing ones, though limits benefits for high-income earners

Potentially eliminates all, except middle-class preferences for mortgage, health, retirement, and charity

Eliminates all under the 23% top rate plan; Eliminates all but Child Credit, EITC, mortgage, health, and retirement benefits under the 28% top rate plan

Alternative Minimum Tax, PEP and Pease (Limitations on high-income tax benefits)

Maintains PEP and Pease; replaces AMT with a “Buffett Rule” minimum tax of 30%

Eliminates

Eliminates

Payroll Tax

Increases the top rate from 2.9% to 3.8%

   Maintains

Increases the wage base 2% each year until 2050

Other Taxes Contained in Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) Maintains

Eliminates

Maintains

Estate Tax

Maintains

Eliminates

Maintains

Gas Tax

18¢ per gallon

18¢ per gallon

23¢ per gallon

Tax Revenue as a Share of GDP in 2015

19.40%

18.00%

19.30%

Spending as a Share of GDP in 2015

22.40%

20.00%

21.40%

Deficit as a Share of GDP in 2015

3.10%

2.00%

2.10%

Publicly Held Debt as a Share of GDP in 2015

79.40%

Not Scored

69.00%

Balanced Budget

Never

2020

2037

* Based on the “Buffett Rule” minimum tax of 30%.

** Includes the 3.8% investment tax under the Affordable Care Act.

Sources: Candidate statements, CBO

[polldaddy poll=6522453]

Here is the results of last week’s poll on gay marriage in Maryland with 262 votes cast.

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Top Story

West Nile Virus On The Rise Again 6 Reasons To Love Maryland’s Talbot County And Eastern Shore

Letters to Editor

  1. Michael Hildebrand says

    September 9, 2012 at 7:24 PM

    Neither party has any intentions of fixing the debt problem, they just tell you that they do to get re-elected. The only difference between the two is which programs they want to charge on the US credit card. In order to change the way things are being done in Washington, you are going to have to change the players that are there. Re-electing or electing any candidate from either party is just continuing more of the same. It is time for new parties and new ways of thinking to emerge and lead this country. But this will never happen because the American people have been brain washed into thinking the only parties that are capable of run this country are the only two in power now. So I as you this, how has that worked for us for the past 200 years? Until Americans grow a pair and elect real change, there will be no change. Start learning what comes after a trillion, because that’s where they are leading us!

  2. Bill Parks says

    September 9, 2012 at 11:25 PM

    Although the national debt is the direct result of Congress failing in its constitutional duties, neither party is equipped to deal with the debt. Very few people, in or out of government, appear to understand the nature and operation of privatized fractional reserve currencies. Our currency is issued by the Federal Reserve System, a privately owned cartel consisting of the Federal Reserve Central Bank in Washington, D.C., the twelve regional reserve banks, all commercial banks with national charters and some commercial banks with state charters opting to purchase stock in the regional reserve banks.

    Keep in mind, aside from coins minted by the federal government, all of the currency in circulation is created as the principal of loans made by the Federal Reserve monetary and banking system. When governments, corporations, institutions, and individuals borrow money from the banking system, new money is created by the system. Almost every dollar in the economy is borrowed from the banking system by somebody. When borrowers repay these loans, that currency is destroyed. If all loans were to be repaid, there would be no currency in the economy at all. But some of the debt would remain because money to pay the interest on loans must also be borrowed.

    The total amount of debt in the economy must constantly increase to keep currency circulating in the economy. Debt must double periodically, about every twenty years, just to pay the interest. For example, the total debt in the economy now stands at about $57 trillion, with annual interest of $3.66 trillion. The interest will consume the entire $57 trillion in fewer than 16 years (57 /3.66 = 15.57 years). To keep the currency from collapsing, the U.S. must increase its total debt to $114 trillion in the next twenty years.

    On the other hand, Congress can exercise its enumerated constitutional authority to issue the nation’s currency directly without creating debt, cutting programs or rasing taxes.

  3. Steve Payne says

    September 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM

    I voted for the Simpson Bowles plan or similar.

    The study mentioned above and used for the chart was put out by a DC think tank with a board that includes or included people from Pharma, Oil, Koch Brothers, A Rep congressman that now runs another conservative think tank etc…

    The Tax Policy Center says that the Romney plan would increase the defecit by $450,000 by 2022 but adds that it’s imposible to really score it. Same with CBO, can’t score it.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Foundation#Board_of_directors

    https://articles.marketwatch.com/2012-06-18/commentary/32283535_1_tax-plan-bush-tax-cuts-tax-rates

    • Steve Payne says

      September 11, 2012 at 7:12 AM

      I meant 450 Billion increase of the deficit by 2022, sorry.

  4. MB Troup says

    September 11, 2012 at 2:41 PM

    I like SB for the top four tax rates and their handling of entitlements. We have a 1972 tax policy. Income is income, and our tax policy should reflect how income is derived in the year 2012. Put me in the Romney column for all else. Some of that stuff at the bottom is pretty much a pipe dream – like Steve’s $450k 🙂 Obama gets an 0fer on this one.

    • Steve Payne says

      September 13, 2012 at 8:48 AM

      Michael, We should run on the American Elect ticket. You can be President since I can’t figure out how to put Smileys in my posts. (future smiley location)

Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article

We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff.

Copyright © 2023

Affiliated News

  • The Cambridge Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Health
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2023 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in