MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
August 24, 2025

Chestertown Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Chestertown

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy
Uncategorized

Cambridge Matters: A Call to Action for Dorchester Voters Charter Reform by Steve Rideout 

March 11, 2024 by Steve Rideout

Share

Ok, Dorchester voters including those in Cambridge, Hurlock, and all of the other towns in Dorchester County, you now have the opportunity, and I think the obligation, to speak out on a very important topic. You need to let your voices be heard now and in November with regard to the Dorchester County Charter Commission’s recommendations for changes to the current County Charter.

You can do this now by coming to the County Council meeting on March 19, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. in the County Office Building or you can email, call, or speak in person to your County Council representative. What the Charter Commission was able to do is complete and improve on the efforts of the Dorchester Citizens for Better Government that seeking to collect enough signatures from registered voters throughout the county to have a vote on possible changes to the county charter as part of the last election cycle. We fell short. The Dorchester Charter Commission has done what we were not able to do and added other proposals.

They developed a list of eight recommendations with explanations that were part of a presentation to the County Council earlier this month, and the council is asking the public to provide their thoughts on which of the proposed changes should go on the ballot in November 2024. Hearing from the citizens is always important, so you need to speak out in support of what your fellow citizens have suggested after months of work.

In November, whatever issues are placed on the ballot, fifty percent plus one voter has to approve the proposed changes that the County Council will have approved for consideration and vote. While we do not know how much public input from the voters is required for the County Council to act, the more people that tell them to place all of the proposals on the ballot, the more likely those proposals will be on the ballot.

That will allow for a formal up or down vote on each proposal in November after you, the voters, have had the chance to learn more about all of them and the pros and cons for each. I am confident that as part of the upcoming elections there will be people who are for or against a proposal. I know that the Dorchester Citizens for Better Government will be urging passage of whatever is on the ballot, as these proposal make for good sense and help create better government. During our efforts to obtain signatures, we obtained over 1300 signatures in support of two of the proposals having to do with the county manager and transparency.

I would suspect that most of you who reside in Dorchester County, including its towns and cities, may not know what the proposals are. That is understandable. It is also understandable that all of them should be on the ballot so that you can give your voice to which ones you want and which ones you do not want.

The county charter has not been changed, I am told, since it was originally passed many years ago. Much in our world has changed since then, and one of the most important changes is that most larger cities, like Cambridge, and counties have gone to a form of government called council-manager where there is a paid experienced and full time manager for the day-to-day running of the government that includes the hiring and firing of staff, while a county or city council creates the vision, policy, and direction for the county or city for the manager to run.

The Charter Commission provided both an explanation for each proposed change along with a suggestion of the appropriate language. While those explanations and the proposed language are too long for this report, the proposed changes are these:

  • Add language that would solidify the difference between the responsibilities of the County Council and the County Manager.  We would like to emphasize:
    • County Manager is the only one allowed to direct employees
    • When position is vacant, search must start immediately
    • If position is not filled timely, alternative search measures must be employed.
    • County Manager must be available full time.
    • County Manager can not take direction from individual council members
    • Only the County Manager can hire and fire county employees

  • Change the requirements of the County Manager to remove the residency requirement

  • Change the Administrative Review to require it be done in the first fiscal year of each new Council

  • Change the requirements of the County Director of Finance to remove the residency requirement

  • Change the due date for the proposed County budget

  • Change the adoption date for the County budget.

  • Add language to section 606 to increase transparency and to ensure that the most effective means are used to disseminate meeting information.

  • Add language to the County Charter to limit a County Council member to 3 four year terms (for a total of 12 years).

I hope to be able to provide more information regarding the above-proposed changes, but the important thing for you to do now is to contact your county council member (not the city council) and let him know that you want to have a vote on all of these proposals in November.

Thanks for reading.

Steve Rideout is the mayor of Cambridge,  Maryland.

Judge Rideout is the former Chief Judge of the Alexandria, VA Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court (1989-2004). From 2004 until the present, he has consulted in different states to support their efforts to improve their child welfare systems. From 2016 to early 2021, he was the Ward 1 Commissioner on the Cambridge City Council. Throughout his career, he has been an advocate for improving the lives of children in his and other communities.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Off The Bench: The County Charter by Steve Rideout 

May 2, 2022 by Steve Rideout

Share

As I mentioned in last week’s article about the Cambridge City Charter, “…words in the Charter do mean something, and it is not up to elected officials to decide that they can ignore them or…”. This week I would like to take the discussion a little further with regard to our county charter.

The Dorchester Citizens for Better Government was formed last year because our county council had failed until recently to follow the requirements of the Charter and establish a Charter Commission. As a result of the Dorchester Citizens work, two petitions are being circulated among the registered voters in Dorchester County seeking signatures for two ballot initiatives. They seek to allow the voters to vote in November on the proposed changes to the charter that would obtain greater transparency in county government and greater efficiency and effectiveness in its day-to-day operations by showing the meetings on TV or over the internet and by having a county manager that actually runs the day-to-day operations of the county.

Under Section 603 of our current county charter, the following language appears: 603. Charter Review Commission.

  1. A Charter Review Commission shall be appointed by the Council no later than three months following the Council’s installation after the general election of 2010 and every 10 years thereafter, within three months following the Council’s installation after the general election. The Commission may also be appointed at such other times as the Council, in its discretion, may determine. The Charter Review Commission shall be composed of seven registered voters of the County, including at least one member from each council district established pursuant to Section 204 of this Charter. The chair of the Commission shall be elected from and by the members of the Commission.

While there is additional language in this section and what is written could be clearer, the bolded language above is clear. Ten years following the 2010 election and council installation, the “Charter Review Commission shall be appointed by Council…”. This time around over a year later it was finally established . Now some might say that the Covid-19 Pandemic is a good reason not to have established the commission, but the county council and most other organizations have continued to function through this time.

It was not until mid-2021 that county council began the process of establishing the Charter Review Commission. As of the time that I write this in April 2022, the February 15th and March 1st county council meeting minutes that are the last currently available to the public indicate that only five of the seven members have been appointed. Missing were a second at-large member and the representative for District 5. I just learned that the other two members have been appointed as well, but the general public would not be aware due to the delay by county council to approve the minutes of its more recent meetings.

Even with the Commission being formed, given how long it has taken, there is no guarantee that any of the recommendations it might make would be in time to be placed on the November ballot or would be approved by the council. In addition, given the council’s apparent lack of an appetite to forming a Commission and complying with the law, the council could well decide to delay consideration of, or reject outright, any recommendations from its own Commission so as to avert a November vote by county citizens. 

It is for the above reasons and many others that the Dorchester Citizens for Better Government have undertaken these ballot initiatives. The citizens of Dorchester County are expected to follow the laws of the county, state, and federal government. If we don’t there could be consequences for that behavior.

Should not the county council be held to the same standard? While there is no requirement under the current charter for county council to take any action on any recommendations of the County Charter Commission, the language of the charter about appointment of the commission is clear. Because of the lack of transparency by the current county council and the manner in which its meetings are held, most of the public is unaware of the requirement for the creation of the Charter Commission every ten years or the fact that county council has now been over a year since it began its efforts to appoint the Charter Commission.

Interestingly, since the current council member from District 5 is not running for re-election and there is no provision for the county council to appoint a member if she had continued to fail to appoint one, the Charter Commission might want to consider recommending a solution to that challenge and others that have presented themselves this time around when it has the opportunity to meet.

Words have meaning. Citizens are entitled to be made aware. County Council needs to follow the law in a timely manner.

Thanks for reading. Please be in touch.

Judge Rideout is the former Chief Judge of the Alexandria, VA Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court (1989-2004). From 2004 until the present he has consulted in different states to support their efforts to improve their child welfare systems. From 2016 to early 2021, he was the Ward 1 Commissioner on the Cambridge City Council. Throughout his career, he has been an advocate for improving the lives of children in his and other communities. He can be reached at [email protected]   

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Cambridge Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Health
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2025 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in