MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
August 6, 2025

Chestertown Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Chestertown

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy
3 Top Story Spy Highlights

The Silence of the Wild by John Lang

December 31, 2023 by John Lang

Share

Where have all the songbirds gone, long time passing?

They are not much here, not on my one woody acre of the once-so-birdy Eastern Shore. For two decades my home on Rosin Creek has been a birdlife playground and picnic, scene of frantic, furious feasts of unreason.

Painting by Meredith Davies Hadaway

This time of year, for 20 years gone, I’d be refilling my two seed feeders about every four days. This year I started them again in mid-October, as usual — and two months later I’ve had to refill just twice.

Where goldfinches once clustered half dozens at a time for busy quarter hours, they now come rarely and singly . I see a few sparrows and the resident wren, and yesterday a flock of robins gobbling all the winterberries. I’ve watched murmurations of small black birds over the creek twice this week.

What I hardly see are the previously most common: chickadee, nuthatch, titmouse, junco, house finch and cardinal. I’ve noticed bluejays, as you will do when the bullies come around, but not often. No woodpecker nibbles the suet cakes. No dove pecks the grounds, though a mama dove did raise two broods in her nest atop my window air conditioner this spring for the second year.

I’m certain there are fewer geese resting on the creek these days than were there in recent winters. I’ve heard the flat b’bam- b’bam-bams of shotguns in the far fields, punctuating goose life, really rarely this fall. When the birds aren’t there, it seems, hunters aren’t so much either.

A friend who lives a mile down the Chester River also has refilled her feeders just twice  in two months. Two friends who live in Washington, D.C., tell me they see very few birds at their backyard feeders, which years before were busy with them. A pal in Cos Cob, Conn., says the same.

The most avid birder I know, who lives next the Chestertown middle school playground, thinks his feeders are getting normal visits. If mine aren’t, he advises, it may be that a neighbor has set some up in better habitat, an owl has taken up close residence, or an outdoor cat is prowling near. Or, maybe I let my feeders get moldy, as people often do, and birds are repulsed.

I want that to be it. I dump the old seed, soak feeders in bleach, rinse, dry, rehang and refill with hope. Nope. They don’t much come. They’re hardly here.

Yes, my observations about vanished birds are personal, random and scant. Anecdotes aren’t science. And the variables are many.

But . . .

When I check with the Cornell Lab, the go-to source for bird fandom, I’m appalled to learn the first-ever comprehensive assessment of avian populations of the U.S. and Canada has found a three-billion-bird decline since 1970. And, “Losses include favorite species seen at bird feeders, such as Dark-eyed Juncos (down 168 million), White-throated Sparrows (down 93 million) …even the Red-winged Blackbird [historically abundant in Maryland marshes] has declined by 92 million birds.”

In summation the authors of the study call this “A staggering loss that suggests the very fabric of North America’s ecosystem is unraveling.”

And consider: that study is dated 2019. Does anybody think the natural (and unnatural) world has gotten any more benign for living things over the past four years?

Not for birds, not according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which this fall reports Bird Flu is raging again in North America, “has spread around the world with astonishing speed…and recently reached the Antarctic for the first time.”

The department states the H5N1 virus has affected 72 million farmed birds in the U.S. alone over the past  three years and last winter saw the worst bird flu outbreak in the nation’s history.

Next, from the journal Nature Communications: “In the United States alone, outdoor cats…have contributed to the extinction of at least 63 species of birds, mammals and reptiles.”

I don’t hate cats. I keep one. But Harpo has sneaked outside just once in his life and was snatched right back and chastised, so he’ll never do it again of course. I do despise cats that creep into the yard, attentions on my feeders. I have worse regard for their errant keepers. But I cannot blame cats for the birds I don’t see. They do what they’re born to do. And we took them there, brought them here. No, it’s on us. People.

And maybe our feeders? Some avian researchers, their views not ascendant, argue that feeders are threats to songbirds, bringing species that instinctively keep apart flocking unnaturally close in hunger, spreading sickness and death. This is some expert advice I have so far declined to heed, from selfish birdish pleasures, despite that logic.

And now, just before Christmas, Nature Communications presents us another study, estimating 1,430 bird species or 12 percent of all the avian species ever thought to exist, have been driven to extinction by human activity over the past 120,000 years. This team of scientists at the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology warns the world is at risk of losing up to another 738 bird species over the next few hundred years — due to climate crisis, diminished food sources and deforestation (People!).

When will we ever learn?

Not in our time on earth. Apparently.

John Lang is a writer living in Chestertown. He has been a reporter/editor for The Associated Press, U.S. News & World Report, The Washington Post and Scripps-Howard News Service.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Spy Highlights

The Prince and I by John Lang

April 10, 2021 by John Lang

Share

Dear departed Prince Philip, what a jolly good time we shared! I cannot claim we remained close, afterwards, but he did once offer to show me his underwear.

It was long ago and far away – 1983, California – but I remember so clearly. The British royal couple came on their yacht Britannia to cruise up the West Coast, stopping at select ports along the way to dispense royal favors and royal cheer.

I was invited with a handful of American reporters to come aboard the first night in San Diego as honored guests. We were not to report on anything. We were not to speak to the queen unless spoken to (an equerry was standing at her shoulder to murmur in her ear which notables she might wish to recognize, and these did not, alas, include me). We were not to touch the queen. Left unsaid was the punishment for doing it.

Thus briefed, we American reporters were invited aboard and proffered whisky. Yes, we were.

After an aperitif or two, it occurred to me that the real role of the royals here was the peddling of British products. Aside from the few unspeakable and unspoken-to reporters, the many other guests were esteemed purveyors of British luxury wares: Jaguar, Land Rover, Rolls Royce dealers, various importers of refined malts, and such – as well as California politicians perhaps in position to smile on British enterprises. And all the above’s wives … well their present ones.

The first spouse Her Majesty and I encountered – I say we, in the sense I was hanging close by Elizabeth because I’d never seen a queen before, and here she was – anyway, what that woman did was put a hand to the queen’s shoulder.

Royalty does not flinch before commoners, yet I could tell the queen did not enjoy the touch. I imagined the equerry’s hand tightening on sword hilt and an inch of blade rising from the scabbard – but something in Her Majesty’s manner stopping his lethal steel. Of course, he could have dispatched the damsel sometime my back was turned; she was not seen again.

“Queen,” she spoke then, while still she could, as she withdrew frosted fingers, “we have something in common.”

Elizabeth’s eyes didn’t flicker at the presumption. Nor did she encourage an explanation, but she got one.

“Yes! We both own Corgis!”

A pause.

“Mm,” said the Queen.

The next wife of someone prosperous wondered if Elizabeth had read “The Prince and the Pauper.”

As I recall, it is the tale of a vagabond rogue who sneaks into a prince’s chambers where both realize they look exactly alike and so decide to switch places for a time. The pauper gets to eat bonbons for breakfast and sleep in silk; the prince wins liberty to discover the varieties of gruel and to shelter wherever he can break into. The moral of the story is, of course, that both are ennobled by their experiences.

“So,” asked the merchant’s missus, “did you ever want to do that yourself?”

“Nooo,” said the Queen in roundest vowels, “I rather liked my life.”

And she moved majestically on. Queen Elizabeth II, I regret to say this but I must, is no bundle of fun. She’d be a dud in your book club. She reminded me of Aunt Grace, my grandfather’s spinster sister who gave me handkerchiefs for Christmas when I was small, with the admonishment, “Keep your nose clean.”

Then, across the canopied deck I espied Prince Philip, grinning amid a circle of merry men I recognized as lower sorts, scribes. I managed to escape the queen’s attentions, as usual, and ambled over to join the mirth.

However, as I got there the mood turned. The Prince famously loathed the press, and on this occasion when we were his guests he generously shared with us his regal views of us.

He said he’d been made president of the World Wildlife Federation and been urged to hold a press conference.

“Oh, no,” Philip said he protested, “the first question reporters will ask is, ‘What color’s your underwear?’”

“No, no,” he said he was informed, “these are serious environmental journalists” – suggesting they’d want to know the fine things he’d be doing for elephants in Africa when he wasn’t shooting birds at Balmoral.

“And do you know,” harrumphed His Highness, “the very first question they asked was, ‘What color’s your underwear?’”

With that, Philip tugged his trousers away from his admirably trim abdomen, opening a gap of inches, and glanced downward. Naturally, I understood this was an invitation to see for myself, and being keen for a scoop and highly trained, I went up on my toes, leaned a bit forward and looked down there.

It is my professional duty to acknowledge, for there are standards, that I could not be certain of the tint; his nether garments were obscured by the tails of his stuffed shirt, and as I bent forward His Highness seemed to edge backward. All that I could glimpse was shadowed and thoughtfully arranged. As is proper.

Unfortunately, the prince and I were never able to get together again, surely in part, I admit, because each was dilatory in reaching out. Even so, Britons everywhere became informed about our curious encounter.

I, and Muriel Dobbin of McClatchy Newspapers, and Dick Growald of the San Diego Union had agreed that when we got off the bountiful Britannia with bellyfulls of royal spirits, we’d swap notes, and when the tour was done and they couldn’t cart us to the scaffold we’d publish and be damned. That accord didn’t last eight hours. Next morning, Dick had a story page one in the Union, telling all, the knave.

Now, the Royal Press Corps was barred from the soiree but that did not stop their wicked behaviors. Although none had witnessed anything, each published ledes that went like: “You cannot believe what appalling things the colonial press are saying about Your Royal Family” (Period, paragraph, pick up wire copy … ).

It certainly was not in the spirit of American criteria for journalistic thieving, if any, and I’m sure the British people could scarcely believe what they were being told.

But I daresay, few subjects of the crown ever got the chance, quite the way I did, to get close to Ole Phil, a sharing host, a sartorial wonder, and a prince of a fellow.

At the time of this event, John Lang was a reporter for U.S. News & World Report. He has been an advisor to the Spy Newspapers since 2009.

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Cambridge Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Health
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2025 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in