MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
February 8, 2023

The Chestertown Spy

An Educational News Source for Chestertown Maryland

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy
Point of View Letters to Editor

Letter to Editor: What Does the Musical Hamilton Have in Common with Historic District Commission and its Town Council?

October 27, 2022 by Letter to Editor 5 Comments

Share

A theme of the smash-hit musical Hamilton is Alexander Hamilton’s behind-the-scenes deals with Jefferson and Madison. And a theme for Chestertown’s Historic District Commission and its Town Council is the recent apparent behind-the-scenes deal with Washington College over the fate of the landmark Armory.

Without any public announcement, let alone discussion, the Historic District Commission voted at its October 5 meeting to permit the demolition of the Armory. This request was coyly disguised on the agenda as “New Business, Washington College, 509 S. Cross Street, demolition.”

This vote violated the HDC’s own Guidelines in numerous ways, the most apparent is that such a request must be filed 25 days before the scheduled meeting at which the request is to be considered. This one was filed on September 28 for an October 5 meeting—that’s 18 days short of the requirement.

The Guidelines list literally dozens of other requirements for consideration of a demolition. From what I have seen so far, almost every requirement was ignored. At no time during the October 5 meeting, did any member of the HDC even refer to any of these requirements.

What is both ironic and truly outrageous is that Kees de Mooy and John Seidel, who wrote the HDC Guidelines, participated in this October 5 HDC meeting. De Mooy is the Town’s representative and staffer to the HDC. He routinely reviews applications and is responsible for advising the HDC on policies and procedures. Seidel, a Washington College employee, made a presentation on behalf of Washington College. It is impossible for either of them to argue that they were unaware of the Guidelines requirements—or that these requirements don’t somehow now matter.

Although not required by the Guidelines, this HDC approval to tear down the Armory was rubber-stamped by Chestertown’s Town Council on October 17.

All this left me feeling that there was something going on behind the scenes to which those of us in the general public are not privy. Therefore, I filed a Maryland Freedom of Information Act request for all documents related to Washington College’s request and all communications with the Town staff, the HDC, and the Town Council related to this request. The Town’s responses are due by October 27.

I will let you know what I find out.

Barbara Jorgenson
Chestertown

Filed Under: Letters to Editor

Opinion: MAGA Redefined by Steve Parks Common Scents by Angela Rieck

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Letters to Editor

  1. Rev. Ells Tolliver says

    October 27, 2022 at 3:13 PM

    Thank you Barbara for being on top of this

    Reply
  2. Cl Ra says

    October 27, 2022 at 3:19 PM

    This is so sad. It would have made a fabulous event venue (much needed in Ctown). I saw all of the chairs being thrown in dumpsters and wondered why the ones in good condition weren’t donated to a local organization in need. What a waste of resources but we all saw this coming when the Environmental Center was built, right?

    Reply
  3. John Michael Kramer says

    October 27, 2022 at 5:07 PM

    Such an ugly eyesore. Hope it can be replaced by something more in keeping with our community values and soon.

    Reply
  4. George R. Shivers says

    October 27, 2022 at 5:19 PM

    I know that the armory has sentimental value to native Kent County residents. I understand that. What historical value it has frankly escapes me, nor is it attractive architecturally in my opinion. What it does have is a prime waterfront location, which, I believe, can be put to much better purpose. Finally, the College administration seems to be doing that, and in my opinion is to be congratulated rather than criticized.

    Reply
    • George Hardy says

      October 28, 2022 at 2:41 PM

      I agree completely with Mr. Shivers. Well put.

      Reply

Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article

We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff.

Copyright © 2023

Affiliated News

  • The Cambridge Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Health
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2023 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in