Screen Shot 2016-07-26 at 8.43.54 AM

5 Things We Learned about Maryland from the Democratic National Committee’s Leaked Emails

Share

Democratic National Committee emails leaked Friday by Wikileaks revealed that party staff was working to undermine Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign.

The leak brought down party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and threw the first day of the Democratic National Convention into disarray. It also revealed that party staffers had some pretty interesting things to say about Maryland and some of its elected leaders.

Here are the five most interesting things we found in the staff emails — everything from disparaging remarks on a delightful town on the Eastern Shore to openly cheering for one candidate in Maryland’s contested Democratic Senate primary.

(We left a message seeking comment with the Democratic Party on the emails included in this story.)

1) A top staffer called Cambridge, Maryland, a “shitty town.”

National Finance Director Jordan Kaplan was asked by a colleague in May about his visit to Cambridge, on Maryland’s Eastern Shore.

“It was fine. Shitty town and were(sic) only stayed for a few hours. We spent the night in Annapolis.”

2) A party official called news of former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley’s presidential campaign fundraiser “just sad.”

After he ended his quixotic bid for the presidency, O’Malley held an “Irish Wake” to raise money to pay down his campaign debt. DNC Mid-Atlantic Finance Director Alexandra Shapiro forwarded a POLITICO article about the event to a colleague, writing, “This is just sad…”

3) The party’s top spokesman called either O’Malley or the Baltimore Sun’s Washington correspondent a “joke.”

Baltimore Sun Washington correspondent John Fritze emailed the DNC requesting information about how moderators determined how many questions to ask each candidate during Democratic primary debates.

In forwarding the message to colleagues to determine how to respond, a staffer noted that Fritze’s query came after complaints from O’Malley that he “didn’t get enough time” during debates with Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.

Party Communications Director Luis Miranda responded: “Hilarious. What a joke that guy is. You can tell (Fritze) on background that it’s entirely up to the networks and leave it at that.”

It’s unclear whether Miranda was calling Fritze or O’Malley a joke.

4) The DNC tried to use Maryland’s Steny Hoyer to combat suggestions that the party was in the tank for Hillary Clinton.

A reporter for The Hill asked the DNC to comment on allegations by former Ohio State Sen. Nina Turner that the party mistreated Bernie Sanders during the primaries. Miranda suggested the reporter interview Hoyer to “balance out Nina’s perspective.” Hoyer, an outspoken supporter of Hillary Clinton, “could give you a very different perspective,” Miranda wrote.

5) A staffer called Rep. Chris Van Hollen’s win in the Democratic Senate primary over a fellow Democrat “so beautiful.”

A colleague sent Scott Comer, the party’s finance chief of staff, a link to a tweet noting that Van Hollen had won a hotly contested battle for the Senate seat left open by the retirement of Sen. Barbara Mikulski. Comer’s response from his iPhone: “So beautiful.”

By JULIE GALLAGHER and ANN PARANGOT

 

Maryland GOP Senate Candidate Backs Trump, But Skips His Convention

Share

Gov. Larry Hogan isn’t the only high-profile Maryland Republican to take a rain check on the GOP’s national convention.

Instead of traveling to her party’s gathering where Donald Trump claimed the GOP’s presidential nomination Wednesday, Maryland House Minority Whip Kathy Szeliga decided to remain in her own state to focus on her campaign against Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Kensington, for the open U.S. Senate seat.

Delegate Kathy Szeliga announced her campaign for U.S. Senate in November. Capital News Service Photo by Marissa Horn.

Delegate Kathy Szeliga announced her campaign for U.S. Senate in November. Capital News Service Photo by Marissa Horn.

“I am a little sorry I couldn’t be there,” said Szeliga, who represents Baltimore County in the Maryland House of Delegates. “But I should be here (in Maryland) meeting voters.”

Szeliga, who joined Hogan Tuesday in Annapolis at a roundtable discussion on helping veterans and picked up the governor’s formal endorsement, added that she couldn’t justify the expenses
for such a short trip.

“I couldn’t go back to my donors and ask for $2,000 for it,” she said. “So I made a choice.”

This choice, she said, would earn her points among Marylanders for being fiscally conservative, noting that she has significantly less campaign cash than Van Hollen.

The Democrat had raised slightly more than $8 million through the second quarter of 2016, compared with her $434,000, according to OpenSecrets.org, a campaign finance website.

Although a majority of Maryland Republicans – 54 percent – opted to support Trump in the state’s primary April 26, some of the state’s Republicans have kept their distance from the real estate mogul.

Hogan has said he has no plans to vote for Trump and has been critical of him. Szeliga, running in a state that traditionally votes Democratic in presidential elections, has said she will support her party’s nominee, but is concentrating on her own contest.

That doesn’t sit well with some Marylanders here.

Some delegates, who wished to remain anonymous to avoid antagonizing another party member, privately expressed discontent and disappointment with Szeliga’s and Hogan’s absences in Cleveland at a time when unity is a key goal of their party after a fractious primary season.

“Obviously, the hope of the convention is to establish a sense of unity,” Szeliga said. “I’m on ‘Team Kathy.’ I’m very focused on that, and the GOP is focused on ‘Team Trump’ this week.”

Since announcing her candidacy in November, Szeliga has said she would support “the presumptive nominee,” but has openly denounced some of Trump’s statements.

“I have been an independent thinker, and I stand by that,” she said. “I’ll continue to be that person who calls balls and strikes. Voters in Maryland expect (that).”

Representatives from Van Hollen’s campaign criticized Szeliga for any alignment she has with Trump.

“Delegate Szeliga can run from the Republican National Convention, but she cannot hide from the fact that she supports Donald Trump and what he stands for,” said Bridgett Frey, Van Hollen’s campaign spokeswoman. “(She) would only bring the same dysfunction and discord to the U.S. Senate, and Maryland families deserve better.”

Bill Harris, an alternate at-large Maryland delegate to the GOP convention from Cecil County, said Szeliga was “running for a seat that’s been labeled ‘Democrat’ for a long time, and she’s got to work.”

But he had less sympathy for others who stayed away, although he didn’t mention specific names.

“We’re seeing quite a few absences of elected officials,” Harris said. “And I think they’re going to pay for it.”

By Jessie Campisi
Capital News Service

Maryland GOP Senate Candidate backs Trump, but Skips Convention

Share

Gov. Larry Hogan isn’t the only high-profile Maryland Republican to take a rain check on the GOP’s national convention.

Instead of traveling to her party’s gathering where Donald Trump claimed the GOP’s presidential nomination Wednesday, Maryland House Minority Whip Kathy Szeliga decided to remain in her own state to focus on her campaign against Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Montgomery County for the open U.S. Senate seat.

“I am a little sorry I couldn’t be there,” said Szeliga, who represents Baltimore County in the Maryland House of Delegates. “But I should be here (in Maryland) meeting voters.”

Szeliga joined Hogan Tuesday in Annapolis at a roundtable discussion on helping veterans and picked up the governor’s formal endorsement.

“She’s a fighter, she’s tough,” said Hogan at an Annapolis news conference. “She can win this race, she should win this race and she’ll make a great United States Senator.” (From a Facebook video.)

Szeliga saidt she couldn’t justify the expenses for such a short trip.

“I couldn’t go back to my donors and ask for $2,000 for it,” she said. “So I made a choice.”

This choice, she said, would earn her points among Marylanders for being fiscally conservative, noting that she has significantly less campaign cash than Van Hollen.

The Democrat had raised slightly more than $8 million through the second quarter of 2016, compared with her $434,000, according to OpenSecrets.org, a campaign finance website.

Keeping their distance

Although a majority of Maryland Republicans – 54 percent – opted to support Trump in the state’s primary April 26, some of the state’s Republicans have kept their distance from the real estate mogul.

Hogan has said he has no plans to vote for Trump and has been critical of him. Szeliga, running in a state that traditionally votes Democratic in presidential elections, has said she will support her party’s nominee, but is concentrating on her own contest.

That doesn’t sit well with some Marylanders here.

Some delegates, who wished to remain anonymous to avoid antagonizing another party member, privately expressed discontent and disappointment with Szeliga’s and Hogan’s absences in Cleveland at a time when unity is a key goal of their party after a fractious primary season.

“Obviously, the hope of the convention is to establish a sense of unity,” Szeliga said. “I’m on ‘Team Kathy.’ I’m very focused on that, and the GOP is focused on ‘Team Trump’ this week.”

Since announcing her candidacy in November, Szeliga has said she would support “the presumptive nominee,” but has openly denounced some of Trump’s statements.

“I have been an independent thinker, and I stand by that,” she said. “I’ll continue to be that person who calls balls and strikes. Voters in Maryland expect (that).”

Van Hollen camp criticizes Trump connection

Representatives from Van Hollen’s campaign criticized Szeliga for any alignment she has with Trump.

“Delegate Szeliga can run from the Republican National Convention, but she cannot hide from the fact that she supports Donald Trump and what he stands for,” said Bridgett Frey, Van Hollen’s campaign spokeswoman. “(She) would only bring the same dysfunction and discord to the U.S. Senate, and Maryland families deserve better.”

Bill Harris, an alternate at-large Maryland delegate to the GOP convention from Cecil County, said Szeliga was “running for a seat that’s been labeled ‘Democrat’ for a long time, and she’s got to work.”

But he had less sympathy for others who stayed away, although he didn’t mention specific names.

“We’re seeing quite a few absences of elected officials,” Bill Harris said. “And I think they’re going to pay for it.”

Maryland Republicans Seek Party Unity, Face Resistance as Trump’s Nomination Nears

Share

As Donald Trump seems primed to accept the nomination as the GOP’s 2016 presidential candidate Wednesday at the Republican National Convention, party leaders are eying a problem: finding a way to coalesce the base around the controversial business mogul.

A July New York Times/CBS News Poll found that just over a third of Republicans are unsatisfied with Trump as their party’s nominee. Another Morning Consult Poll the same month found that 46 percent of party members said their party has “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

Efforts to present a party with one voice this week have been halting. For example, Paul Manafort, Trump’s top aide, said Monday morning that Ohio Gov. John Kasich, who is not attending the convention, is “embarrassing his party in Ohio.”

And those problems reared their head Monday on the floor of the convention in Cleveland.

At one point, party opponents to Trump began shouting for a roll call vote. They aimed to force all 2,742 delegates to vote on a procedural motion that had to pass before the convention could get underway.

Making the vote a drawn out process instead of a foregone conclusion could have reflected negatively on Trump’s goals of unifying the party as prime time TV coverage of the convention began.

Eventually the roll call vote failed.

Jim Crawford, 68, a rules committee member from Bryantown, Maryland, said the rules roll call was an attempt to make a statement by disaffected Republicans.

But despite the disagreement, Crawford said, “we are still a unified party, we will still unite behind the candidate, we will still unite behind Mr. Trump.”

“There are others who are disappointed in the whole process who will still support him because the alternative, Hillary (Clinton), is so horrible,” Crawford added. “They dislike Mr. Trump, but they cannot stand Hillary.”

Anne Arundel County Executive Steve Schuh said at the Maryland delegate breakfast Monday morning that Trump was not his first choice in the 2016 Republican primary.

However, as a party leader, Schuh said he must accept the GOP voters’ choice, as 60 percent of them voted for Trump in the state’s April 26 primary.

“Those of us who represent Maryland have to bear in mind that was the primary voters’ (decision),” Schuh said.

A short walk away from the convention center at Settler’s Landing Park, supporters of Trump held an “America First Unity Rally” with the goal of bringing together the different factions of the Republican Party.

Speakers included members of various minority and interest groups — such as Women United for Trump, Christians for Trump, Students for Trump and Bikers for Trump — that sought to diversify Trump’s base of support.

Keynote speakers included Diamond and Silk, a pair of African-American sisters who have catapulted to internet fame with their fiery support for the presumptive Republican nominee on YouTube.

A July NBC/WSJ poll found that African-Americans back Clinton over Trump by an 84 to 7 margin. But the high-energy duo said that the Democratic party does not have the best interests of black Americans in mind, and that they should no longer vote as a monolith.

Black voters “can get off that Democratic plantation,” Diamond said. “My African American brothers and sisters … you need to get your behind up and vote for someone like Donald Trump.”

Milo Yiannopoulos, an openly gay conservative reporter for Breitbart News, stood before the crowd of about 100 and proclaimed that Trump was the best candidate for LGBT people.

Yiannopoulos brought up the shooting at an Orlando gay club on June 12, which resulted in the death of 50 people, including the shooter, and injured another 53.

Supporting a candidate that understands protecting the county’s borders, he said, is something all Americans must do, no matter their sexuality or political ideology.

“You might be a churchgoing Republican, and I have nothing but respect for you,” Yiannopoulos said. “You might not be totally down with the gay lifestyle, but we’re your gays, not theirs.”

Diana Waterman, the state chairman for the Maryland GOP, said members of the Republican party must unite behind Trump, even if he was not their first or second choice.

Avoiding a Hillary Clinton presidency, she said, must be the rallying call for Republicans.

“Once we nominate (Trump),” Waterman said, “he is our nominee and he is going to be the next president, because, as I said, it can’t be Hillary.”

By JOSH MAGNESS and JULIE GALLAGHER

–CNS reporter Jessie Campisi contributed to this report

 

Dual Enrollment with High Schools and Community Colleges in Maryland Grow in Popularity

Share

In an effort to find greater academic challenges and tackle future student debt, more Maryland high school students are taking college classes for credit — for some, a full semester of courses — in addition to their regular high school schedules.

In some Maryland counties, more than a quarter of the senior class is enrolled in a college course, and in some jurisdictions, students are beginning four-year college with half their credits already completed.

“You have to be motivated. It takes discipline and hard work,” Hagerstown Community College Director of Public Information Elizabeth Kirkpatrick said.

Called Dual Enrollment, students take college level classes that go toward both high school and college credit and, depending on the county, the community college and school system will pay either a portion or all of a student’s tuition.

Overall, there are approximately 10,000 high school students involved in Dual Enrollment throughout Maryland. The number of high school students at community colleges in the state jumped by 20 percent in the fall 2014 semester compared to the previous year, according to Bernard Sadusky, executive director for the Maryland Association of Community Colleges.

Sadusky said that several factors account for the increase.

“First, the school systems and community colleges have been marketing the opportunity better to students and families. And then the success of the programs,” Sandusky said. “Parents are realizing that student debt has become a national discussion point and they are realizing that this is the most affordable thing you can get. Parents and students are fearful of being in debt.”

Approximately 5,453 high school seniors — 9 percent of the 12th-grade students in the state — were dually enrolled in a public high school and a Maryland postsecondary institution during the 2013-2014 academic year, according to a December 2015 report by the Maryland Longitudinal Data System Center. That was two percentage points more than during the 2012-2013 academic year, according to the report.

In the 2013-2014 academic school year, Washington County, which includes Hagerstown Community College, had the highest percentage of dually enrolled high school seniors of every Maryland jurisdiction, with 28 percent.

There are nine public high schools in Washington County and most of the students participate in Dual Enrollment through Hagerstown Community College.

Assistant Director of Recruitment and Admissions at Hagerstown Community College Kevin Crawford credited two different dual enrollment programs: Essence and Middle College.

Essence allows high school students to take Hagerstown Community College classes for half a day at their high school with professors from the college coming to teach.

Middle College allows students to take classes full-time at the community college for two years, receive an associate’s degree by the time they graduate high school and also earn their diplomas.

The Middle College program is currently only available to public school students in Washington, Prince George’s, Howard, and Baltimore counties, according to Maryland Association of Community Colleges Executive Director Bernard Sandusky.

A traditional Hagerstown Community College student would pay approximately $9,540 in tuition to take all of the classes needed for an Associate’s Degree, but dually enrolled students pay less. Washington County Public Students and Hagerstown Community College provide a 50 percent tuition discount for the first 12 credits that they take, saving them up to $1,300. In addition, some dually enrolled students at Hagerstown Community College earned STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) scholarships that range from $500 to $2,000 per semester, which affects how much more money each student ends up saving.

Overall, if a dually enrolled student at Hagerstown Community College receives only the initial discount from the school system, they would pay approximately $8,200 for two years of classes to get an Associate’s Degree, or $4,100 per academic year, according to Hagerstown Community College Middle College Coordinator Teresa Thorn.

For the 2015-2016 academic year, the nationwide average tuition for a four-year private nonprofit university was $28,746 and the nationwide average tuition for a four-year public university nationwide was $8,070, according to data from the U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics.

At the University of Maryland, College Park, a full-time in-state student paid approximately $4,076 in tuition per semester during the 2015-2016 academic year, and up to 60 credits earned through Dual Enrollment at any Maryland community college can transfer to the university.

But the credits that are able to transfer over also depend on the type of Dual Enrollment class taken and whether it would fulfill a requirement for the student’s major, according to the University of Maryland’s Office of Undergraduate Admissions.

“They know they can save some money,” Crawford said.

Nate Harrell, a 17-year-old senior at North Hagerstown High School in the Middle College program, said he plans to attend Liberty University in the fall to study engineering and explained that while certain financial advantages played a factor in participating in Dual Enrollment, he also felt that he could be challenged more academically by taking a college workload while in high school.

“I felt like a lot of my classes (in high school) were holding me back because they were so slow compared to what I could learn,” Harrell said.

Natalie McHale, a 17-year-old senior also from North Hagerstown High School who is in the Middle College and will attend Clemson in the fall to study engineering, said that compared to a high school that might have limited choices for Advanced Placement classes, the Middle College allowed her to take courses that she wanted to take.

“You can pick the classes you want to take,” McHale said, “If you’re interested in biology, you can take those.”

Even though Advanced Placement and Dual Enrollment courses can both offer students college credit, the way to obtain that credit is noticeably different between the two programs.

“For the AP, you have to take the AP test and pass it. Personally, I didn’t pass mine so I couldn’t get any credit for college,” McHale said, “But going here, you automatically get the credit. It’s a lot more work for a college class, but at least you get the credit.”

Several administrative officials for Washington County Public Schools said that their schools have had a strong relationship with Hagerstown Community College.

Rachel Kurtz, a guidance counselor for Clear Spring High School in Clear Spring, said that the school has had a total of 35 students involved in dual enrollment courses this past year.

Jeff Stouffer, principal of Washington County Technical School in Hagerstown, said 31 students at his school are getting dual credit for a college algebra class.

National studies have also been conducted to show the differences between students involved in Dual Enrollment in high school and their future chances of academic success in college.

In one nationally representative sample of students who began postsecondary education in 2003, students who took Dual Enrollment courses ended up being 10 percent more likely to earn a bachelor’s degree than their counterparts, according to a 2013 study by the University of Iowa.

In addition, about 82 percent of U.S. public high schools reported that some students were enrolled in a dual credit course in the 2010-2011 school year, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.

Hazel Ware, a 16-year-old senior at Charles Flowers High School in Springdale, is also about to graduate with a high school diploma and an associate’s degree through Dual Enrollment at Prince George’s County Community College.

Ware took college-level classes for subjects such as Spanish, music and statistics. She was recently accepted into the University of Maryland, College Park and the University of Pittsburgh, and has been waiting to hear back from several other universities including Stanford, Duke and the University of Chicago.

Even though she will have the opportunity to save money by graduating high school and college at a quicker rate, Ware also said the impetus to take college credit classes early was to challenge herself academically.

“For me, it’s more of wanting to get a head-start,” Ware said, “I’m thinking of attending a private school so the courses may not necessarily transfer over and that’s fine. I just wanted to gain the experience that I need in order to do well in college.”

In Maryland, public institutions of higher education are permitted to accept students who have completed at least seventh grade and if they have obtained a certain score on a nationally accepted college entrance exam, such as the SAT or ACT, according to the Maryland State Department of Education.

State Sen. James Rosapepe, D-Prince George’s, sponsored a bill this past legislative session that would award high school and college credit to middle school students for taking college classes through Dual Enrollment. Rosapepe said that the state and individual counties wouldn’t have to pay anything for the bill and that counties would continue paying the same amount of money that they are paying now for Dual Enrollment programs. The bill successfully passed unanimously in both the Maryland Senate and Maryland House of Delegates during the 2016 General Assembly session.

However, there is some concern that some students are not ready to take Dual Enrollment courses over the traditional Advanced Placement classes available in high schools.

University of Maryland, College Park Director of Undergraduate Admissions Shannon Gundy said she wants to make sure students are doing Dual Enrollment for the right reasons and that only the appropriate students are taking the courses.

“If we are talking about students that really are gifted and really are academically talented that can move at an advanced pace and are ready to take college level courses and prepare to do well in them, that’s one thing,” Gundy said. “When we have students that are really just trying to eat up college credits like Pac-Man, and they may not be prepared and may not have exhausted the opportunities that were available for them within their high school, then that does give me some pause.”

Gundy also said that it’s difficult to understand the motive for a student to take community college courses if their high school already offers a challenging curriculum where they earn college credit. She said that the purpose and advantage in going to high school and using the high school’s resources is to build a solid academic foundation.

“It also allows students time to grow and mature, to develop the skills that they’re going to need in order to be successful in a college classroom and there’s a disadvantage to rushing that,” Gundy said.

Connor Norton, an 18-year-old senior at North Hagerstown High School in the Middle College program who will attend McDaniel College in the fall, disagreed and said that he thought it was a good thing getting several college credits out of the way early.

“We’re saving a bunch of money and that’s a big factor to most people,” Norton said.

In Prince George’s County, the school system has paid an increasing amount of money for the Dual Enrollment program in recent years. When Dual Enrollment began in the county, in the 2012-2013 fiscal year, the school system spent $20,332. That number increased to $69,092 in 2013-2014, and to $299,048 in 2014-2015.

During this current fiscal year, which ends on June 30, the county school system spent approximately $487,299 on Dual Enrollment, according to information provided by Maryland’s Office of Budget and Management Services.

The growing cost is linked to the number of students participating in the Dual Enrollment program through Prince George’s County Public Schools. In the 2014 school year, 29 students in the county participated in Dual Enrollment in the fall 2013 semester and 35 in the spring 2014 semester. Those totals jumped to 139 students in summer 2014, 252 in fall 2014, 289 in spring 2015, and 274 students for the past fall 2015 semester, according to information provided by Prince George’s County Public Schools as a result of a Public Information Act request.

Ware said that with the college credits she amassed through Dual Enrollment in Prince George’s County, she has saved $6,520 and expects to save more in the future, by having to take fewer courses to get her degree at a four-year university.

“Thanks to the implementation of the Dual Enrollment program, I will graduate college early and most importantly, save a tremendous amount of money,” Ware said.

Laura Palmer and Claire Galvin, both high school juniors enrolled in Hagerstown Community College’s Middle College, said that a student needs to have dedication and a good work ethic in their classes in order to get the college credit. Galvin added that the Middle College allows the students to build their own academic foundation by giving them the experience on how to handle a college workload and that even if she has to retake a class later at a four-year school, she would already have knowledge to build from.

“I’m not sure if I’m going to go on with engineering, I may change, but I feel like everything I’ve taken here is going to help me later, even if it doesn’t count for transferring,” Galvin said.

“It’s really a cheap way to find yourself, instead of going to a four-year and spending thousands and thousands,” Norton said.

By Connor Glowacki

 

Maryland’s Vacant Mental Health Hospital Problem

Share

Six miles outside of Annapolis lie the decaying bones of a dinosaur.

They don’t belong to a prehistoric animal, but to Crownsville Hospital Center, a mostly vacant former asylum that costs the State of Maryland around a million dollars a year.

Many of the methods used to treat mental illness when Crownsville opened in 1911 have essentially gone extinct.

The availability and quality of medications have increased, and providers are trending toward treatment through community-based services, like psychiatric rehabilitation, housing and vocational programs, according to Jeff Richards, the incoming president of the Mental Health Association of Maryland and the CEO of Mosaic Community Services.

“There’s so many people that probably 20, 30, 40 years ago would have lived out their lives in one of those large institutions (who) are living in the community and doing great with the right range of support available to them,” Richardson said.

This means that large facilities, like Crownsville, became obsolete. No longer did the state need to run a 500-acre facility that could house 4,000-5,000 patients. These people could receive treatments in their communities while the stately brick buildings rusted and aged.

Since the hospital officially closed in 2004, Crownsville has cost the state of Maryland more than $13 million. Security guards roam the campus, a mix of lawn and trees, presiding over crumbling walls, broken windows and dark buildings.

Van Mitchell, Maryland secretary of health and mental hygiene, has made getting these empty facilities off his books a priority since he was appointed by Gov. Larry Hogan in 2015.

His department owns around 5 million square feet of real estate, and more than 53 percent of that is vacant.

“If we were in the real estate business, we’d be out of business,” he likes to say.

Among the five non-operational hospitals the state owns — Crownsville, RICA Southern Maryland, Rosewood, Upper Shore and Brandenburg — the department of health and mental hygiene has spent more than $27 million since the facilities have closed.

Some of the properties bring small revenues in from rent. The state leases the Upper Shore Community Health Center to Kent County for $1 per year.

Kent County then pays the utilities and operating costs — $378,000 in 2015 — for mental health programs and substance abuse treatment.

Because Kent County is so small, it’s not an attractive location for private rehabilitation companies, according to Andrew Pons, the program director for the A. F. Whitsitt Center, which is located at the Upper Shore Community Health Center.

“We’re the only option people have,” Pons said.

In Crownsville, 10 nonprofits lease the space for $1 per year each, including the Anne Arundel County Food Pantry.

Budget analysts are quick to note that $27 million, which works out to around $3 million per year, won’t break the budget. It’s not a massive sum of money within the context of a $42 billion annual operating budget for the state.

Still, it’s money that isn’t being spent on much of anything.

Most of the annual operating expenses go to keeping up the grounds: fixing broken windows, mowing the lawns and providing security against errant high school kids or copper-pipe thieves.

To put it in perspective, Hogan added $4 million to the state’s budget to fund a task force to study and combat the state’s heroin and opioid epidemic.

Regardless of how much it is, Mitchell said, any money spent on empty hospitals is wasted resources.

“That’s a cost to the department that should be going back into the community for services,” Mitchell said.

He’d like to see that money go to more beds to treat opioid addiction, or to the construction of a new hospital.

Part of the problem is that these facilities are what he calls “siloed.”

They are chronic hospitals that were mostly good for one thing — treating mental illness — and aren’t flexible enough to treat other types of disease.

Moreover, the hospitals are old — Rosewood opened in 1888 — and full of asbestos.

Removing asbestos from buildings as old and large as the ones found in Crownsville and Rosewood could cost between $4 million and $8 million, according to Derrick Harris, an Environmental Project Manager with Access Demolition Contracting in Brooklyn, Maryland.

Another $700,000 was allocated in the 2016 Capital Budget to get Rosewood in a condition to be purchased by Stevenson University, formerly Villa Julie College, in Baltimore County.

“Stevenson University has been apprehensive to acquire the property due to concerns about abatement,” the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee wrote.

A spokesman for Stevenson said he couldn’t comment until a Memorandum of Understanding was finalized between the school and the state, but that the university is still interested.

There’s also the problem of priorities. Mitchell knows his department isn’t the only one vying for capital funding, the money that would be spent to build a new hospital or fix the old ones.

“We can’t compete with school construction,” Mitchell said.

By Rachel Bluth

Van Hollen Defeats Edwards in Maryland Senate Primary

Share

Democrat Chris Van Hollen Tuesday won a closely-fought primary battle for the Maryland Senate, easily defeating fellow House member Donna Edwards for the seat being vacated by Barbara Mikulski.

With 88 percent of Maryland precincts reporting, Van Hollen had 53 percent of the Democratic vote to Edwards’ 39 percent.

Addressing supporters from his election night headquarters in Bethesda, Van Hollen noted that Mikulski “understood you never forget the people back home,” and promised to do the same as the state’s next senator. Mikulski did not attend the celebration.

Historically, winning the Democratic Senate primary is tantamount to election in November, especially in a presidential election year, when Maryland voters’ Democratic leanings are strongest.

“Whether you’re from…the Baltimore area, whether you’re from the Washington suburbs, or from western Maryland, or southern Maryland or the Eastern Shore, I will fight hard for you everyday in the United States Senate,” he said.

Kathy Szeliga, a state lawmaker from Baltimore County, won the Republican Senate primary in a multi-candidate field with 36 percent of the vote.

Maryland has not had an open U.S. Senate seat since 2006, when Democrat Paul Sarbanes retired.

Van Hollen served in the Maryland General Assembly as both a delegate and a state senator before winning election to the House of Representatives in 2002. A resident of Kensington, Van Hollen represents Maryland’s 8th District, which includes parts of Montgomery, Frederick and Carroll counties.

Before his election to the House, he worked as an attorney for 10 years in private practice.

Van Hollen voted in Kensington Tuesday morning before visiting voters at Leisure World in Silver Spring and meeting with supporters in Baltimore.

House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, did not publicly endorse either candidate, but joined Van Hollen at his election night headquarters, a sure sign of his support now.

Van Hollen recently won the endorsement of The Washington Post and Baltimore Sun editorial boards, as well as former Democratic presidential candidate and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley.

Van Hollen said the country has “a lot of work to do” to address issues of economic equality, gun violence, mass incarceration and climate change. But in order to effectively address these issues, Democrats will need to win both the White House and a majority in the Senate, he said.

“We’re going to have to work very hard in every part of the state, in every corner of the state,” Van Hollen said. “We’ve got to campaign for every vote in every part of this state.”

Maryland Delegate Al Carr, D-Montgomery, was working the polls at Kensington Town Hall, his home voting location, in support of Van Hollen.

Carr said Edwards and Van Hollen are both strong politicians, but he thinks Van Hollen will be able to “deliver” for voters in the Senate.

“He has outstanding constituent service,” he said. “I’ve seen time and time again where his staff, his office have helped people solve problems. I think that’s really important.”

At Van Hollen’s election night headquarters, supporter Sam Witten, a lawyer from Bethesda, said Van Hollen has integrity, a strong record of constituent service, and is willing to reach across party lines. Witten, 59, said he volunteered in Baltimore and Takoma Park Tuesday in support of the candidate.

“For me it was not a hard choice,” Witten said. “He’s an extraordinary candidate, a great leader and he takes care of his people.”

Edwards, who highlighted her experience as a black woman and a single mom, fell short in her attempt to become the second black woman to serve in the U.S. Senate.

“Our battle is not over and our work is not done,” Edwards said at her watch party in Lanham. “This campaign has never been about me or my opponent… It’s about fixing a broken political system.”

Edwards said she called Van Hollen after the results to congratulate him.

In his address, Van Hollen thanked Edwards “for being a strong advocate for Democratic party values and priorities.”

Edwards has represented the state’s 4th District, comprised of parts of Anne Arundel and Prince George’s counties, since 2008. She was the first African American woman to represent Maryland in Congress.

Herman Flora, of Hyattsville, said Tuesday morning he voted for Edwards because he feels black voters need greater representation.

“Nothing against Van Hollen personally,” Flora said at Ridgecrest Elementary School, “But I felt this was more important to me.”

The contrast between Van Hollen and Edwards split Maryland voters and provided a tight race until the final weeks before the primary.

A University of Maryland-Washington Post poll conducted in late March and early April found the race was a dead heat, with Van Hollen holding a four-point lead over Edwards: an advantage within the survey’s margin of error. But a Monmouth University Poll last week showed Van Hollen pulling ahead of Edwards 52-36 percent.

The UMD-Washington Post poll also showed a sharp racial divide in the race, with likely white voters supporting Van Hollen by a 2-1 margin while black voters supported Edwards 3-1.

Maryland will elect a senator in the Nov. 8 general election.

“Together we’re going to go forth from this evening and win the general election and we’re going to be part of a new Democratic majority in the United States Senate,” Van Hollen said.

By TROY JEFFERSON, LEXIE SCHAPITL and AUBURN MANN

Talk of Restrictions Watched Closely in Trade-Busy Maryland

Share

Presidential candidates in both parties are proposing changes to international trade policies that could have dramatic impacts not only on the United States in general, but also on busy trade centers like Maryland.

Republican Donald Trump has proposed a 45 percent tariff on exports to the United States.

More broadly, Trump has lambasted the Obama administration for making poor trade deals with China and other nations, agreements that the New York real estate tycoon insist should be scrapped for pacts more favorable to the United States.

On the Democratic side, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has attacked former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for supporting numerous trade agreements that he claims are costing Americans jobs and harming the global environment.

Trade is a closely-watched issue in Maryland, which hosts its presidential primary on Tuesday, along with Connecticut, Delaware, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.

Baltimore is home to the 13th-busiest port in the United States and could feel the impacts of more restrictive trade policies, according to a 2015 Logistics Management study.

The Port of Baltimore generates $2.9 billion in personal income, while contributing $310 million in state, county and municipal tax revenue annually, according to the Greater Baltimore Committee. The port conducts business with countries on six different continents.

In 2014, Greater Baltimore collected $12 billion from exports of goods and services, according to the Greater Baltimore Committee’s Baltimore Metro Export Market Assessment of 2015.

The port of Baltimore directly generates 14,600 jobs, as well as 108,000 jobs statewide linked to port activity, according to James White, the executive director of the Maryland Port Administration.

“Without a healthy, vibrant and bustling Port of Baltimore, many of those jobs would be lost,” White wrote in The Daily Record’s 2015 report.

Trump uses trade as a prime example of why, in his view, the United States “doesn’t win any more.”

“The 45 percent tariff is a threat. It was not a tax, it was a threat. It will be a tax if they don’t behave,” the businessman explained at a March 10 debate.

“Take China as an example. I have many friends, great manufacturers, they want to go into China. They can’t. China won’t let them,” Trump continued. “We talk about free trade. It’s not tree free trade; it’s stupid trade. China dumps everything that they have over here. No tax, no anything.”

In 2014, the most recent year data is available, the Port of Baltimore held the record for the fourth year in a row for handling more autos – a half million – than any U.S. port. The port added Fiat and Mazda to its client list in 2014.

The Baltimore port is also ranked first for its handling of farm equipment and machinery, imported forest products and imported machinery, according to the report.

Baltimore hosts one of two eastern U.S. ports with a 50-foot deep shipping channel and berth that can handle some of the world’s largest container ships.

Fred Mason, the president of the Maryland and District of Columbia AFL-CIO, called Trump’s assertions nonsensical and stressed the importance of free trade.

“America needs a strong manufacturing base to be an equal partner in world trade,” Mason said. “If we enter into trade agreement that our so lopsided until they only benefit one country, as we see with the proposed TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership), that’s not fair.”

Maryland is headquarters to many large companies engaged in international trade, including Under Armour and Black & Decker.

Based in Baltimore and dependent on the port for exports, Under Armour saw its sales skyrocket this past year, but could possibly feel the pinch of Trump’s trade policies.

The 20-year-old company is worth $500 million and its clothing products are sold in over 60 countries, including China. International net revenues made up 12 percent of total revenues for the fourth quarter of 2015, according to the company’s January

Under Armour did not return phone calls and emails seeking comment for this story.

If Trump’s trade policies were enacted, the nation would go into a recession, according to a study by Moody Analytics for the Washington Post. The country would lose four million jobs and 3 million would not be created, the study said.

Sanders is an avid critic of international trade agreements like the Trans- Pacific Partnership and the 24 year-old North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which established essentially unfettered trade among the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Sanders’ website refers to the TPP as “a disastrous trade agreement designed to protect the interests of the largest multi-national corporations at the expense of workers, consumers, the environment and the foundations of American democracy.”

The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a 12-country free trade agreement between the United States, Canada and 10 countries in the Asia Pacific region, which was drafted in 2015 and signed on Feb. 9.

During a Democratic primary debate in New Hampshire on Feb. 4, Sanders attacked Clinton’s stance on free trade, particularly the TPP, and referred to his consistent opposition to any recent trade deals.

“I was on the picket line in opposition to NAFTA. We heard people tell us how many jobs would be created,” said Sanders. “I didn’t believe that for a second because I understood what the function of NAFTA, CAFTA (Central American Free Trade Agreement), PNTR (Permanent Normal Trade Relations) with China, and the TPP is: it’s to say to American workers, hey, you are now competing against people in Vietnam who make 56 cents an hour minimum wage. This is an area where the secretary (Clinton) and I have disagreements.”

Clinton, who originally supported the TPP while serving as secretary of state during President Barack Obama’s first term, now is against it.

During the same debate she explained: “I did hope that the TPP, negotiated by this administration, I was holding out hope that it would be the kind of trade agreement that I was looking for. Once I saw the outcome, I opposed it.”

Clinton still is ultimately for trade at some level. “We have to trade with the rest of the world,” she said. “That’s the way the global economy works.”

J.D. Harrison, senior editor of digital content for the U.S. Chamber of Congress’ online forum, Above The Fold, argued that Trump’s plans to tax imports from Mexico and China would cause serious trouble for the economy.

“Under Trump’s trade plans, we would see higher prices, reduced spending power, fewer jobs, and a weaker economy, both here at home and abroad, according to the analysis,” Harrison said. “Of course, that’s the last thing our country and the global economy need right now.”

Harrison suggests that instead of implementing new restrictions, the United States should be opening more doors for international business.

“We should be tearing down trade barriers, not putting up more in place,” he said.

In the United States, trade supports 41 million jobs and boosts the average annual American household income by $13,600, according to U.S. Chamber of Commerce data.

Even so, some voters are in support of Trump’s ideas about trade. At a rally Wednesday for Trump in Berlin, Md., Kathy Richardson, a retired state worker, said that America needs someone with Trump’s business acumen.

“We need someone like him for trade — he’s really good at making deals with other countries,” Richardson said. “He stands up for America.”

By JOELLE LANG, AUBURN MANN and TROY JEFFERSON
(CNS reporter Rebecca Rainey contributed to this report.)

GOP Candidates Bring Anti-Government Message to Government’s Backyard

Share

The Republican presidential candidates continue to advocate smaller government and less spending. But will such messages resonate in Maryland, a state that has benefited from its proximity to the federal government?

That is one of the issues Maryland voters will grapple with in Tuesday’s primary.

Odds are very good that in any audience the GOP candidates address in the new few days, there will be more than a few people who depend on government for their livelihoods or their business.

The fact is, 503,000 Marylanders hold local, state and federal government jobs, according to March statistics from the state Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation. That accounts for roughly one in five jobs in the state.

In addition, the federal government alone spent $15,834 per person in Maryland in fiscal 2014 – 27.5 percent of the state’s total economic output, according to a Pew Charitable Trusts study released in March. Only Virginia receives more federal dollars per person.

“The fact that we are so close to D.C. (means) federal employment is a lot of our economic engine, whether you look at government services or contracts,” said Sen. Addie Eckardt, R-Caroline, Dorchester, Talbot, and Wicomico Counties. “It works well when the economy is doing well, but when there are cutbacks in D.C. and we are overly reliant on those jobs, it hurts the Maryland economy.”

Government employment acts as a cushion for the Maryland economy. Consider this: during the recession, the state unemployment rate peaked at 9.8 percent in early 2010, according to data from the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation.

However, one sector barely was affected by the economic turmoil: government jobs.

Republican businessman Donald Trump, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Ohio Gov. John Kasich all would change the financial landscape of Maryland, making the government less present in the daily lives of Marylanders and likely decreasing federal job opportunities.

For example, one section of Cruz’s campaign website is bannered by this quote from the senator: “We should shrink the size and power of the federal government by every and any means possible. What does that mean? That means eliminating unnecessary or unconstitutional agencies.”

Faith Loudon, of Pasadena, Md., who is running to be a delegate for Cruz, echoed her candidate’s anti-government ideology. Cruz’s desire to reign in government spending and introduce a 10 percent flat tax for all taxpayers will spur job economic growth, Loudon said.

“There is too much government and (Cruz) wants to cut down on the agencies,” she said. “His flat tax is a great idea as well. We need less government because it hurts our businesses.”

Cruz was a key figure in the 16-day federal government shutdown in 2013.

Kasich has a similar, if not more anti-government view. In January 2015, Kasich said, “There’s no money in Washington. It’s my money.” At a rally last month, he added: “When government doesn’t change at the speed of business, we ring up $19 trillion in debt.” In a November interview with NBC News, the former House Budget Committee chairman said, “There’s nobody who’s spent more time shrinking government and cutting budgets than I have.”

Kasich’s cuts would include major tax breaks for businesses and major reductions in government spending according to an article by The Huffington Post.

In a February debate, Trump promised to “cut so much, your head will spin,” including eliminating the Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency, to decrease the national debt.

Cruz has been more specific, including not only the Department of Education, but also the Departments of Energy, Commerce, and Housing and Urban Development and the Internal Revenue Service on his hit list.

Some Maryland residents, however, have a much less dismal view of government, including Garwai Young, a 23-year-old Democrat who supports former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“You trust government as much as you want to put trust in it,” Young said. “It should intervene when necessary, but we have to put faith in (government officials) that they will make the right decisions.”

The anti-government theme is not unique to this year’s GOP presidential hopefuls. Shrinking government and spending has been a mantra of Republicans in Congress for years.

In 1979, when Georgia Republican Newt Gingrich first entered the House, he had an agenda much like the candidates today: to combat government spending. To do that, he first had to win GOP control of Congress.

Gingrich succeeded: his party secured a House majority in the 1994 elections. But the takeover would not be without repercussions for the Republican establishment and future elections.

“He wanted them to throw the ‘in’ party out and bring the ‘out’ party in,” Norman Ornstein, a longtime congressional observer with the American Enterprise Institute, wrote in The Atlantic in January, referring to Gingrich. “That meant a long campaign to delegitimize Congress, politics, and politicians.”

Analysts argue that the Republican push against government has resonated with GOP voters across the country in recent election cycles.

“The more Tea Party activists in a district, the better Republican candidates did (in 2010) and the more likely Republican representatives were to vote with the Tea Party on issues salient to the movement,” Michael Bailey, professor of American government at Georgetown University, observed in a 2012 article for American Politics Research.

Anti-government Republicans have been backed by a base of party voters that, according to many polls, is far more angry and frustrated at the federal government than are Democratic voters.

A Pew Research Center poll last November found 8 out of 10 Republicans and Republican-leaning independents favoring a smaller government that does less. Just 31 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents shared that view.

But in Maryland, polling data has revealed that while there is concern among voters regarding spending, most residents support the Democrats’ views of an activist government that provides a broad array of services and tries to address major social issues:

• Eighty-one percent of Marylanders supported having handgun licensing, fingerprinting and background checks, according to a Maryland Registered Voter Poll conducted by Opinion Works in 2013.

• Sixty-seven percent of Marylanders support increasing taxes on cigarettes and another 54 percent favored eliminating mandatory minimum jail sentences, according to a Gonzales Research and Marketing survey released on March 8.

• Forty-eight percent of Maryland residents approve of the way Democrats in the Maryland legislature are doing their jobs according to a Washington Post poll released April 3.

• Eighty-one percent of Marylanders support sending those convicted of possessing illegal drugs to treatment programs instead of prison, according to the same April 3 Washington Post poll.

• Sixty-one percent of Marylanders approve of Gov. Larry Hogan; 50 percent think he isn’t a “typical Republican,” and another 45 percent think that is “a good thing,” according to a different Washington Post poll released on Oct. 15.

Dan Nataf, director of the Center for the Study of Local Issues at Anne Arundel Community College in Arnold, said it’s hard to gauge the public’s attitude about local government, as most people don’t follow it unless a certain issue pops up, like ceasing the renovation of a school. But you can sense that anti-government tension when dealing with the presidential candidates, he said.

“People who want to essentially build on what exists are having a very hard time to establish themselves and make themselves visible as a candidate with the level of anger and discomfort from the less comfortable voters,” Nataf said.

By JOSH MAGNESS, REBECCA RAINEY and ALANA PEDALINO
(CNS reporter Connor Glowacki contributed to this report.)