Mikulski Mad About State Dept Center

Share

Senator Barbara Mikulski is demanding that federal officials extend the time for public comment on the State Department training facility that has raised a storm of controversy in Queen Anne’s County.

Just three days after the public hearing intended to quiet protests, Mikulski wrote a blistering letter to the head of the General Services Administration that basically accuses GSA and State Department officials with being lazy and incompetent – and with sabotaging their own project.

“They displayed a shocking, inexcusable and inexplicable lack of preparation, which has resulted in threats of lawsuits, widespread anger and what I fear is now an implacable opposition to the project,” Mikulski wrote on Friday.

She said their “disastrous lack of preparation” and their “dismissive attitude” revealed very plainly their “unconscionable lack of respect for our democratic process.”

Mikulski’s angry stand today is remarkable considering that she, along with two other Maryland Democrats, Sen. Ben Cardin and Rep. Frank Kratovil, had been involved in bringing the training center to a site near Centreville and announced its coming proudly in the fall.

Her letter to acting GSA Administrator Stephen Leeds begins, “I want you to be aware of the unmitigated disaster caused by the General Services Administration in rolling out your proposal for a Foreign Affairs Security Training Center. . .”

The senator noted that the proposed facility’s consolidation of security training is greatly needed to improve the safety of American diplomats who are at risk around the world.

But she said, “Apparently, the selection of the location did not take into account the fact that citizens of the local community must be fully involved in any decision to build or expand federal facilities.

“My constituents have a right to know, and a right to be heard. Instead of reaching out to the community, GSA has treated them with a disregard that borders on arrogance.”

Mikulski charged that at the public outreach hearing, GSA officials were “completely unprepared to answer fundamental, legitimate questions.”

“This,” the senator wrote, “conveyed a lack of transparency into the process that is completely unacceptable.”

She complained that GSA “inexplicably” moved the second meeting from the auditorium where it was advertised into a smaller cafeteria  “that deprived my constituents of their rights to have their concerns addressed.”

GSA briefers at two meetings were unable to explain in clear terms, she said, either the environmental impact process or steps to comply with open-space restrictions.

“It is hard to imagine how your team could have done a worse job in explaining this important profject to the community,” Mikulski wrote.

“And while their support might now have been a given even with superb preparation, what might have been viewed as a tremendous economic boost to the Eastern Shore of Maryland is now perceived as a threat to the community’s safety and well being.”

About Simon Kelly

Letters to Editor

  1. Gren Whitman says:

    With Kent Island looking like Glen Burnie Junior, what Upper Shore doesn’t need is more development in Queen Anne’s County! To silence the mob and Senator Barb Mikulski, the property owner should reconsider selling his property to the feds for this questionable project and instead donate his 2,000 farm to the Eastern Shore Land Conservancy, to ensure its benefits to QA County residents, now and in the future.
    Web site for the ESLC is http://www.eslc.org.

  2. I don’t think you will find a lower impact project that returns the benefit of 500, well paying Federal jobs not to mention the jobs that will be created by the spin off of those 500 jobs. Put all those people in cars and make them commute 3 hrs a day. Will the land being put into conservancy compensate for the impact of these commuters ?
    I wouldn’t blame people for wanting to know more, but I really think a knee jerk opposition to the facility is dumber than putting shopping centers in critical areas.

Write a Letter to the Editor on this Article

We encourage readers to offer their point of view on this article by submitting the following form. Editing is sometimes necessary and is done at the discretion of the editorial staff.